Where Is the Green Gap?

What is the green gap and where is it? That’s what I’m thinking about today.

This week I heard Graceann Bennett of Ogilvy & Mather present an analysis titled “Mainstream Green: Moving Sustainability from Niche to Normal.” The work is part of a large research study the firm did to understand consumers’ environmental attitudes and behaviors.

It’s a great piece of research–sound, thought-provoking and actionable. (You can read the full study and related materials here.) I’m going to share some of the thoughts it provoked in me.

The research identified and quantified what it calls the “green gap”– the gap between stated importance  on the one hand and behavior or action on the other. Far more consumers say they care about environmental issues than make environmentally superior choices when given the opportunity. The study sized the green gap in the U.S. at 30 percent: 80 percent of consumers care to some degree about environmental issues but only 50 percent take the opportunity to choose environmentally superior behaviors.

Given that so many consumers seem to care about green, marketers have been frequently frustrated at their inability to motivate consumers to buy “green” products or exhibit “green” behaviors. The study states that “the persistence of the Green Gap when it comes to purchase behavior has made it difficult for many corporations, especially those selling to mainstream consumers, to make a successful business model out of green products and services.”

This research study crystallizes a question for me: Should marketers be focusing on motivating consumers to make green choices? Or should companies instead focus on making their mainstream products and services green? Maybe the green gap lies not between consumer attitudes and behaviors but between company’s products and their potential.

Why have marketers labored to position products as “green,” with its niche appeal, and sometimes inferior price/performance? Why not work to make the products consumers know and love greener, and leave the heavy handed green messaging to niche marketers?

The study closes with a dozen well-supported suggestions for how to close the green gap. Some are deal with messaging and positioning and some deal with product functionality and performance. It points out that green products are sometimes expensive, perform poorly, have niche appeal and are hampered by the fact that many people view green thinking as “feminine.” It urges marketers not to price green at a premium, to boost performance, to broaden the appeal and to shake the girly reputation of green.

I am struck by an analogy with an industry that has a thing or two to teach would-be green marketers: the personal computer industry. This is an industry that started selling costly, poor performing and ugly products that only a geek–almost always a male geek–could love. It was a niche market. Today, computers and other devices embedded with computer power, are beautiful, high performing, and appeal to both sexes. The ubiquity of computers has, of course, brought about significant changes in consumer behavior. But marketers didn’t start out by asking consumers to change their behavior–they changed their products. Mass adoption and behavior change followed.

Marketers need to look inward a bit and learn how to make green an essential attribute of their companies and their products. This may be where the real green gap lies.

What do you think?

Advertisements

3 Comments

Filed under marketing, sustainability

3 responses to “Where Is the Green Gap?

  1. Joymalya Chakraborty

    ” crystallizing questions ” exhibiting equalizing the supply demand equilibrium

    It’s essential to co-relate build to order / make to order demand positions with the demand response from normal consumption during a period of time without safety stock count !

    If 50 % exhibits superior behavior , then 30 % showing some and 20 % none are then the analyzing criteria if only the consumption of 50 % showing 100 % transitional consumption meeting the Gap’s on economic in-equilibrium with price advantage

    Price Inelastic on demand within purchase timing and non centric purchasing lots with transfer revenue management on consumptions classification of basic category into further from energy to food supply may be the track of messaging

    Thank You for your consent , It’s a Nice Article …………………….. !

    Joymalya Chakraborty
    sujoy_joy77@yahoo.co.in

  2. Might there also be another green gap, this one being a subset of a larger gap? The late Arthur Koestler, in his book “Janus”, referred to it as ,”… the contrast between [our species’] unique technological achievements and its equally unique incompetence in the conduct of its social affairs.” The examples he goes on to give are out of date now, but one could cite that we can control the motions of satellites orbiting distant planets but cannot control the situation in Afghanistan, and that man can leave the earth and land on the moon but cannot cross from North to South Korea.
    Where does this fit in with the green gap? Personally I’m pretty confident that the human race has the technological prowess to overcome all the environmental problems that we have caused, and more besides, but I have serious concerns as to whether our social skills are up to the task. Technological problems are resolved by dedicated, well-led teams having success; the social side comes down to every citizen of the earth making certain choices. Education and marketing will help, but unfortunately we are not very good at keeping our new year’s resolutions.
    Therefore we need to use our technological prowess to build green into every product, to protect us from our social incompetence.
    Purchasing is (and always has been) a social activity, even if you purchase on the Internet. Your choices will affect people all over the world, and future generations too.

  3. David Schatsky

    Andrew, thanks for leaving such a thoughtful comment. I couldn’t agree more that the technological side of the challenge is not as daunting as the social (or political) side. Yet there are some hopeful examples of sweeping social change–the U.S. civil rights movement and the turning of the tide against cigarette smoking are two examples–to name two. One can look at those and recognize that such changes are possible, if not easy or quick.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s